Today, it is argued that there are many different definitions of public relations and that it is becomingly increasingly difficult to define the practice.
A blog post on Ragan.com caught my attention recently. It is based on the idea that the term 'public relations' appears extremely fuzzy to many, with more than one definition circulating online and offline. According to the author, Frank Strong, if you ask 10 PR professionals to define PR, you'll get 10 different responses. This appears to be an problem, a conundrum, a complication for any PR practitioner or individual with involvement in the field.
Similarly, Phillip Kotler, a widely published scholar, critically analyses public relations in Marketing 3.0. Kotler emphasises the need for a distinction between public relations and socially responsible actions, mischaracterising what public relations is all about. This leads me to question why are the terms 'public relations' or 'PR' used as synonyms as lipstick on the proverbial pig?
"We have observed that many companies undertake socially responsible actions as public relations gestures. Marketing 3.0 is not about companies doing public relations. It is about companies weaving values into their corporate cultures."
"In Marketing 3.0, addressing social challenges should not be viewed only as a tool of public relations...on the contrary companies should act as good corporate citizens and address social problems deeply within their business models."
In contrast, Richard Edeleman, from Blog 6 A.M rejects the characterisation of PR in Marketing 3.0 and says "This mischaracterisation of PR is deeply degrading and flawed. PR informs and connects companies/organisations with the new expectations of consumers, NGOs, employees and others in the stakeholder society." In agreement with Edelman, I believe it is vital to properly define the discipline regardless of the number of definitions. By collectively addressing the problem, we able to emphasis the sound, honest and transparent qualities of PR and begin to gain consensus.
Furthermore, here are some of my favourite and in my opinion, most accurate definitions of PR:
1. Public Relations is about reputation - the result of what you do, what you say and what others say about you. - Chartered Institute of Public Relations (CIPR)
2. Public relations is the occupation responsible for the management of organisa - tional relationships and reputation. It encompasses issues management, public affairs, corporate communications, stakeholder relations, risk communication and corporate social responsibility. - Theaker, A (2011). The Public Relations Handbook. 4th ed. London: Routledge. 5-6.
3. Public relations helps an organisation and its publics
adapt mutually to each other.Public Relations broadly applies to organisations as a collective group, not just a business; and publics encompass the variety of different stakeholders. - Public Relations Society of America (PRSA)
From studying PR and undertaking work experience placements, I have come to realise PR is an extremely diverse industry which has to adapt in ways due to the changing digital media landscape.
The digital media landscape comprises of a variety of different channels, such as social networks, new platforms, tools and data sources. According to Digital Marketing Analytics, written by, digital media is effective at creating data about who you are, what you like and dislike, and where you’ve been online. Similarly, social media has been a huge influence in the adaptation of the way PR professionals operate. It has given the industry the ability to engage in two-way conversations with its publics, building and maintaining relationships and intrinsically linking brands reputations online and offline.
Nigel Ferrier, director of Optimise PR, explains “social media lets us reach to people more directly through Twitter and Facebook and an ever-growing array of platforms. It used to be B2B and B2C, but now its B2P - with P being people. Social media cuts across channels and is all about engaging with individuals, holding conversations not relying on press releases and launches.”
The constant scrutiny that runs alongside social media can be a potential threat to companies and organisations. It is vital to be fully adaptable to different issues, whether that be feedback, complaints or crisis management. As an example, Bodyform was hugely critiqued on ‘false advertising’ but hit back with an brilliantly witty video response. As described by Sticky Eyes blog, “it showed the brand to be human, because it responded with humour” and generated popularity and discussion online. This shows the importance for PR professionals to prepare successful strategies within the digital media landscape, and be ready for anything at any time.
The changing digital media landscape is evolving, and PR has no choice but to evolve with it. Today, it seems the use of traditional journalism is declining due to no longer being the publics main source of information. Social media platforms and online channels have increased the speed of conversations and interactions across the digital media landscape, meaning it is essential for companies to be accountable and transparent in terms of measurement and cross-team working.